Writing an Academic Book Review
In the enormous system of academic publishing, one of the highly significant inputs is book reviews on which the academic profession is dependent symbiotically. Writing an academic book review must be perceived as one of the effective methods of making significant contributions in service to any profession.
However, book reviews can appear as an insider’s game likewise various academic practices. Therefore, it is essential that the procedure of essential guidance relative to writing reviews for an academic book must be followed along with their method of publication.
However, book reviews can appear as an insider’s game likewise various academic practices. Therefore, it is essential that the procedure of essential guidance relative to writing reviews for
Writing an Academic Book Review
Reactive commissioning and proactive commissioning are two methods that can be adopted by the editors of periodicals solicit writers of the book review and editors of academic journals. Reactive commissions are referred to as the capacity where a review has been proposed by the writer and accepted by different graduate students.
This procedure is mostly followed by most of the journals. Whereas, when potential reviewers are sought by an editor along with solicitation of their contribution, it is referred to as proactive commissioning. Moreover, proactive commissioning is most likely to be targeted if the writer has already an established image within the field. However, reactive commissions are mostly accepted by a lot of journals.
The reactive commission is one of the useful methods for those writers who are writing their first book review. Books already available for review may be advertised or published by some journals, then one can just forward him/herself for one of them.
Besides this, an email to an editor can be sent directly where a newly published book can be suggested which may be relevant to the subject area of the journal of the editor. Some specific books may appear inappropriate, however, the response is receptive mostly. Or, it may also require three to four excellent tries before one can avail his/her first opportunity.
Chances
Higher chances of getting the book review published are present once a good job has been done. In factor, similar to other types of academic writing, like research proposals and journal articles, a formulaic and standard structure tends to be followed by book reviews. One of the most critical factors that must be considered while writing a good book review is the pattern through which an excellent book review can be produced.
The summary of the book is one of the first factors that is most sought and expected by the readers. Thereby, the book review must start with a captivating summary followed by the writers’ opinions. Along with this, it must follow the framework starting with an exceptional introduction.
Followed by a summary of the argument, an overview of the author, a summary of contents with relative weaknesses and strengths, and a conclusion.
