Other than the constitutional contradiction the recruitment in the American voluntary Military was also offended by the claims of inefficient use of manpower-the human resource. The critiques were of the idea that the American Voluntary Military has collapsed its efficiency to fulfill the task and are therefore recruiting people forcefully rather than intentionally. The forceful recruitment also signifies the troubles that the families of the recruited individuals faced.
This provoked that people that joined army as an obligation had their families that were depended on them in one way or the other; these families begin to regard themselves as victimized families, as they find themselves alone to face all the hardships that they have never imagined under the constitution that claims to ensure freedom. The final of all is the crude reality of a civilized state; the people recruited in the American Voluntary Military as per the state’s obligation were discriminated on the basis of their social standing and economic worth. The less wealthy and potent individuals were send fearlessly for fighting in the crucial areas and those having a prosper background were not sent to the high tension areas. These three state implications are the most prudent reason why people of the United States and anti the voluntary military (Shy).